Employment Continues to Erode During The Obama "Summer of Recovery"

 
Stimulus Spending, implemented under the poorly named American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, was supposed to keep job losses low and steadily improve unemployment figures beginning in September 2009.

Under the adopted plan, 2010 was to be the year of recovery.  The Obama Administration argued that the housing market began its rebound during the summer of 2009, and has spent this year lobbying Americans that economic subsidization has achieved its design.

Federal spending better have produced its intended goals by now, because fiscal intervention has largely run its course.  The flow of stimulus has already peaked and will steadily decline going forward.  Census hiring, which temporarily boosted employment figures, has reversed.  State and local governments that maintained bloated payrolls courtesy of stimulus welfare have begun reducing unaffordable headcount.

Economic data clearly demonstrates the failure of Stimulus Spending to achieve its purported benefit, despite an ongoing political narrative to the contrary.

First time unemployment claims have been stagnate the entirety of 2010 and are inconsistent with net job gains. 





The nation's job count improved steadily this year as Stimulus Spending approached its zenith and Census hiring reached an acme.  But the number of Americans employed has fallen consistently during the "Summer of Recovery".  There were 500,000 fewer people with jobs in July relative to April.





The unemployment rate has bizarrely improved during the "Summer of Recovery" as 1.155 million people quit the civilian work force over 3 months.  This mass exodus produced the lowest civilian labor force participation rate since the economic crisis began.  The last time participation was smaller was 1984. 






Obama's "Summer of Recovery" will go down in history as the period during which dismal economic data began to peek through the rosily distorted facade that blurred reality since February 2009.  Instead of employment actually improving, the jobless are becoming discouraged at a pace rarely seen in history.  Sadly, negative employment trends will be reinforced by falling housing prices, looming tax hikes, withering consumer confidence and a likely stock market correction.



 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 8/9/2010 8:14 PM steve bourg wrote:
    Whitney: Succinct, and prescient. Nice going.

    Causes of our dilemna -- besides the horrific CRA regulations in July 1995 (something out of Politburo Russia and courtesy of Bill Clinton et al)?  Others: Expanding federal govt and ever-increasing taxation of the private sector since the 1930s, income redistribution to placate poorer people and get them to vote for Dems, acceptance of illegal aliens taking 10 million entry-level jobs away from potentially hard-working Americans, and increasing entitlement-state benefits that took away individual liberties and responsibility, and increasing pay/benefits of govt 'ees that have created an almost unlimited thirst for MORE private sector taxation.  How many more causes can we name?  None of these are even attempted to be reduced/fixed by the Democrats.  Oh, and the voters' cluelessness can be largely attributed to the failure of the MSM to inform the citizens of all the above excesses.  For some reason, the MSM "journalism majors" have thought all the above were just fine --NOT the problems!
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.