The Homeownership Bubble - An Economic Crisis Explained
[Printer Friendly PDF File]
I continue to be mesmerized by analysis of U.S. Homeownership Rates. The data clearly:
- Establishes when the Housing Bubble began
- Reveals a point of origination where a reasonable person would begin to search for an explanation for the spike in homeownership
- Highlights how dramatic the inflection point was
- Demonstrates the extraordinarily steep slope of those gains
- Documents homeownership rates establishing a U.S. record of 66.0% in 3Q97
- Provides an understanding as to why housing prices began to rise at an unsustainable pace in 1997
- Contrasts the U.S. economy's supportable homeownership range of 63.5% - 65.0% with the Housing Bubble peak of 69.2%

The data also provides insight into where we are in the downturn and a perspective on when it is likely to end.
Historically the U.S. economy has supported a structurally sustainable Homeownership range of 63.5% to 65.0%. The current ownership rate is 67.3%. Due to a reversion to pre-bubble market conditions, that rate will fall at minimum to 65%. Based on an understanding of the Boom-Bust cycle dynamic, I continue to believe that Homeownership Rates will decline to below 64% over the next several years to devastating effect.






Good post...
i am linking to it in today's lineup...
http://www.housingcrisisnews.com/
(lead story)
also, via twitter...
http://twitter.com/HousingBubble
have bookmarked you & subscribed.
Reply to this
I can't believe Bill Clinton declined any sort of culpability for the housing crash, when NBC fluffed, or rather interviewed him.
http://thelastgoodidea.blogspot.com/2009/02/bill-clinton-revisionist-historian.html
Reply to this
Wow, an image is worth a thousand words they say! Hopefully it'll go back to a more normal rate soon, and it won't fluctuate like it shows it did during the 90s. I'm not sure Clinton, as a single person, has much to do with it though.
Reply to this
If you are unfamiliar with Clinton's "National Homeownership Strategy" you don't truly understand what happened during the 1990s. Riegle-Neal, the CRA revision and HUD directed Fannie/Freddie subprime funding were part of a coordinated public policy effort to manufacture 8 million additional homeowners by 2000. The plan worked, achieved its target on schedule, and generated the Housing Bubble.
http://theaffordablemortgagedepression.com/2010/03/11/origin-of-the-housing-bubble-the-national-homeownership-strategy.aspx
Reply to this
Interesting. Thanks for posting the chart. I have to say though that it wasn't so much the government's push toward "affordable mortgages" that contributed as much as "too-good-to-be-true" mortgages - ARMs that lured people away from common sense slightly more expensive but still affordable fixed rate options.
Reply to this